Are We Really Understanding Microplastic Pollution? Looking Beyond the Numbers
Over the past decade, microplastic research has experienced unprecedented growth. Thousands of studies have reported plastic particles in rivers, lakes, oceans, glaciers, agricultural soils, the atmosphere, seafood, drinking water, and even human tissues. This collective effort has fundamentally changed our understanding of plastic pollution, establishing microplastics as one of the most pervasive emerging contaminants of the Anthropocene.
Yet, despite this remarkable progress, I often find myself asking a simple but uncomfortable question: Are we truly understanding microplastic pollution, or are we simply becoming better at detecting it? The first generation of microplastic research was driven by an important objective: to answer whether microplastics exist in different environmental compartments. Today, the answer is unequivocally yes. However, the field has now reached a stage where simply documenting their presence is no longer sufficient. The real challenge lies in understanding what these numbers actually represent, how comparable they are across studies, and whether they truly reflect environmental risk.
As scientists, we frequently compare reported concentrations from different rivers, countries, or ecosystems. However, these comparisons often overlook a critical reality; microplastic abundance is strongly influenced by the methods used to detect them. Sampling strategies, analytical resolution, laboratory protocols, and even the size range investigated can profoundly influence the final numbers reported. Consequently, two studies investigating similar environments may report vastly different concentrations, not because one ecosystem is necessarily more polluted, but because they are observing different fractions of the same pollution continuum.
Microplastic research is therefore entering a new phase, one that must move beyond particle counting toward understanding environmental processes, transformations, transport pathways, and ecological consequences.
Why Do Reported Microplastic Numbers Keep Increasing?
One of the most common misconceptions in microplastic research is that increasing reported concentrations necessarily indicate worsening pollution. While plastic production and environmental inputs continue to rise globally, another equally important reason explains why recent studies often report much higher abundances than earlier investigations.
The answer lies in particle fragmentation.
Unlike many environmental contaminants, plastics do not disappear after entering the environment. Instead, they undergo continuous fragmentation driven by ultraviolet radiation, mechanical abrasion, oxidation, biological activity, and hydrodynamic forces. Every fragmentation event generates progressively smaller particles while conserving the original plastic mass.
From a mathematical perspective, this process dramatically increases particle numbers. A single 5-mm plastic fragment does not simply become two smaller particles; over time it may generate hundreds, thousands, or even millions of particles distributed across the microplastic and nanoplastic size spectrum. Consequently, the particle size distribution in natural environments is heavily skewed toward smaller particles.
This has profound implications for environmental monitoring.
Every reduction in analytical detection limit, from 500 μm to 300 μm, from 100 μm to 20 μm, and eventually to the nanoscale, reveals a substantially larger population of particles that previously remained invisible (Fig. 1). Rather than increasing linearly, reported particle abundance often increases exponentially as progressively smaller size classes are included.
Our own research illustrates this phenomenon remarkably well.
In one of the earliest comprehensive assessments of microplastics in the Lower Ganga River, we reported concentrations ranging from 380 to 684 microplastic particles per 1000 m3 (equivalent to 0.38-0.68 particles/m3) At that time, the investigation focused on particles larger than 500 μm, reflecting the analytical capabilities commonly available during large-scale river monitoring.
A few years later, our laboratory investigated the Mahanadi River, where advances in sampling and analytical methodologies allowed us to examine particles down to 100 μm. Reported concentrations increased dramatically, reaching 337.5 ± 54.4 to 1333.3 ± 557.2 particles per cubic metre, with particles smaller than 500 μm representing the dominant fraction of the total microplastic population.
A similar trend emerged from our subsequent investigation of the Godavari River, where concentrations ranged from 311 to 939 particles per cubic metre, again dominated by particles below 500 μm.
Did these rivers suddenly become more polluted? Probably not. What changed was our ability to observe a previously hidden fraction of environmental microplastics.
This illustrates an important principle that extends well beyond these three rivers. As analytical techniques continue to improve, reported microplastic concentrations will almost certainly continue to increase, not necessarily because environmental contamination is accelerating at the same rate, but because our analytical window continues to expand towards progressively smaller particles.
For this reason, comparisons between different studies should always be interpreted within the context of particle-size ranges, sampling methodologies, and analytical detection limits. Without this context, numerical comparisons alone can easily become misleading.
Behind Every Reported Number
When a scientific paper reports that a river contains several hundred or several thousand microplastic particles per cubic metre, the final number often appears deceptively simple. In reality, that single value represents the outcome of numerous methodological decisions made throughout the analytical workflow. Microplastic assessment begins long before the first particle is counted.
The sampling strategy determines which portion of the environment is investigated and which particles can physically be collected. Different mesh sizes selectively retain different particle populations, while grab sampling, pump filtration, or net-based approaches each introduce their own advantages and limitations.
Once collected, samples undergo digestion procedures designed to remove organic matter without damaging plastic polymers. Choosing the appropriate digestion chemistry is a delicate balance: insufficient digestion obscures plastic particles beneath biological debris, whereas overly aggressive treatments may alter sensitive polymers and compromise subsequent identification.
Density separation introduces another important source of variability. Saturated sodium chloride solutions efficiently recover low-density polymers such as polyethylene and polypropylene but may fail to separate denser polymers like PET or PVC. Higher-density salt solutions improve recovery but increase analytical complexity and cost. Consequently, the choice of density separation protocol directly influences which polymers ultimately appear in the final dataset.
Equally Important Is Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
Microplastic particles are ubiquitous, including within laboratory environments. Airborne textile fibres, contaminated reagents, improperly cleaned glassware, or inadequate procedural controls can all introduce false positives. Conversely, inefficient recovery, particle losses during filtration, or incomplete digestion may underestimate actual environmental concentrations.
For this reason, rigorous QA/QC procedures, including procedural blanks, field blanks, recovery experiments, contamination control, and polymer verification, are indispensable components of reliable microplastic analysis rather than optional additions.
Perhaps the greatest analytical challenge today lies in identifying the smallest environmentally relevant particles.
Traditional stereomicroscopy and visual sorting remain useful for larger particles but become increasingly unreliable below a few hundred micrometres. Vibrational spectroscopic techniques such as Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and micro-Raman spectroscopy have therefore become indispensable for polymer confirmation, allowing researchers to distinguish plastics from natural fibres and other particulate materials with considerably greater confidence.
However, even these powerful techniques encounter limitations as particle size approaches tens of micrometres. Conventional FTIR spectroscopy is constrained by infrared diffraction limits, while Raman spectroscopy may suffer from fluorescence interference and prolonged acquisition times for extremely small particles.
Recognising these challenges, the Environmental Nanoscience Laboratory at IISER Kolkata has recently incorporated Optical Photothermal Infrared (O-PTIR) spectroscopy into its analytical platform. By combining the chemical specificity of infrared spectroscopy with optical spatial resolution, O-PTIR enables reliable identification of considerably smaller microplastic particles than was previously possible using conventional infrared techniques.
The significance of this technological advancement extends far beyond analytical convenience. As detection capabilities improve, researchers are beginning to explore size ranges that were largely invisible only a few years ago. Since smaller particles dominate environmental size distributions, improved analytical resolution is expected to substantially refine our understanding of microplastic abundance, composition, transport behaviour, and ultimately ecological exposure.
In many ways, the future of microplastic research will not be driven solely by finding more particles, but by developing analytical tools capable of accurately characterising the increasingly smaller fractions that have remained hidden beneath the limits of conventional instrumentation.
Are We Looking in the Right Place?
Since the first reports of microplastics in freshwater systems, monitoring programmes have largely focused on answering a straightforward question: How many particles are present in a particular location? While this has provided invaluable baseline information, it has also created an unintended limitation. Most studies still rely on a single sampling campaign, collect water only from the surface, and interpret those measurements as representative of the entire river system.
However, natural rivers are anything but static. A river is a dynamic, three-dimensional system where water is continuously mixed by turbulence, changing discharge, seasonal flooding, sediment resuspension, and biological activity. Microplastics do not remain confined to the surface after entering the aquatic environment. Their vertical distribution is governed by a complex interplay of particle density, size, shape, biofilm formation, weathering, and hydrodynamic conditions. Low-density polymers such as polyethylene and polypropylene may initially remain buoyant, whereas denser polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tend to sink. However, this behaviour is rarely permanent. Biofilm colonisation can increase the effective density of initially buoyant particles, causing them to settle, while turbulence during high-flow events can resuspend previously deposited particles back into the water column.
Consequently, a surface sample often represents only a fraction of the total microplastic inventory within a river. This is particularly important in large river systems and estuaries, where vertical stratification can develop due to changing flow conditions and salinity gradients. Surface waters may be dominated by freshly introduced buoyant plastics, whereas the underlying water column and sediments can accumulate older, weathered, and denser particles. Sediments, therefore, should not merely be viewed as passive repositories of plastic pollution but rather as dynamic reservoirs capable of storing and periodically releasing microplastics during floods, dredging activities, tidal cycles, or storm-induced disturbances (Fig. 2).
Another major limitation of current monitoring programmes is their temporal resolution. Most published studies represent a snapshot of environmental conditions, collected during a single season or even a single day. Rivers, however, undergo continuous seasonal transformations. Monsoon-driven runoff, changing river discharge, wastewater inputs, agricultural activities, and urban stormwater all influence microplastic abundance and transport throughout the year.
Without long-term monitoring, it becomes extremely difficult to distinguish natural seasonal variability from genuine long-term trends in plastic pollution. As scientists, we therefore need to move beyond isolated surveys towards continuous monitoring programmes that integrate multiple seasons, multiple depths, and multiple environmental compartments. Only then can we begin to understand not just where microplastics are found, but how they move, where they accumulate, and how environmental conditions govern their long-term fate.
Do Fish Tell the Same Story?
One might reasonably expect that rivers containing higher concentrations of microplastics would consistently produce fish with greater microplastic burdens. Surprisingly, our investigations suggest that this assumption is often incorrect.
Over the past several years, our laboratory has examined microplastic contamination across diverse aquatic ecosystems, including the eastern coast of India, the Mahanadi River, and the Godavari River. While these studies consistently demonstrated substantial microplastic contamination in surface waters, sediments, and commercially important fish species, the relationship between environmental abundance and biological uptake proved to be far more complex than anticipated. Approximately 30% of fish collected from the eastern coast contained microplastics, this increased to around 50% in the Mahanadi River, while remarkably, every fish analysed from the Godavari River contained microplastics.
At first glance, these results appear to suggest a direct relationship between environmental contamination and biological exposure. However, a closer examination reveals that the dominant microplastic characteristics in fish often differ substantially from those observed in surrounding waters.
Particles dominating the water column are not always the ones accumulating inside organisms.
The abundance of fibres, fragments, films, or pellets in environmental samples frequently does not match the shapes recovered from fish tissues. Similarly, dominant colours observed in water samples, such as transparent, black, or blue particles, do not consistently correspond to those ingested by fish. Differences are equally apparent in particle size distributions and polymer composition. While polyethylene and polypropylene frequently dominate environmental waters because of their widespread use and lower density, fish may preferentially accumulate other polymers depending on their feeding behaviour, habitat, and the environmental history of the particles.
Why Does this Happen?
The answer lies in the complexity of biological systems.
Fish do not behave as passive sampling devices. Different species occupy different ecological niches and employ distinct feeding strategies. Surface feeders encounter a different suite of particles than benthic feeders inhabiting sediment-rich environments. Filter-feeding species may selectively retain smaller suspended particles, whereas predatory fish are more likely to ingest microplastics indirectly through trophic transfer. Even within the same river, particle ingestion is influenced by swimming behaviour, feeding guild, gut retention time, particle density, particle flexibility, biofilm development, and the presence of adsorbed organic matter.
Biofilms further complicate this relationship. Once microorganisms colonise the surface of microplastics, particles begin to resemble natural food items both chemically and physically.
This "eco-corona" may alter particle density, modify surface charge, release attractive chemical cues, and increase the probability of ingestion by aquatic organisms.
These observations carry an important implication. Measuring microplastic concentrations in water alone cannot reliably predict biological exposure or ecological risk. Future studies should therefore move beyond simply correlating particle abundance and instead investigate how particle characteristics, environmental transformations, and species-specific biology collectively determine microplastic uptake within aquatic food webs.
Weathering Changes Everything
One of the most significant misconceptions surrounding microplastics is the assumption that particles entering the environment remain chemically unchanged throughout their lifetime. In reality, freshly manufactured plastics rarely persist in their original form for long. Instead, they are continuously transformed by sunlight, oxygen, mechanical abrasion, temperature fluctuations, and microbial activity, resulting in particles whose properties differ substantially from those originally released into the environment.
Among these processes, photooxidation represents one of the most influential mechanisms driving environmental aging.
Ultraviolet radiation initiates the formation of highly reactive free radicals within the polymer matrix. These radicals subsequently react with atmospheric oxygen, triggering oxidative degradation that progressively weakens polymer chains. The resulting chain scission breaks long polymer molecules into shorter fragments while simultaneously introducing oxygen-containing functional groups such as carbonyl (-C=O) and hydroxyl groups onto the particle surface.
These apparently subtle chemical changes fundamentally alter microplastic behaviour.
The formation of oxygenated functional groups increases surface polarity and hydrophilicity, while repeated oxidation and mechanical stress generate cracks, pits, and irregular surface morphologies. Consequently, aged microplastics possess significantly greater surface roughness and higher effective surface area than their pristine counterparts. These changes create additional sorption sites capable of interacting with dissolved contaminants through electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, complexation, and π-π interactions.
Our recent studies demonstrate that these transformations substantially modify the environmental behaviour of microplastics. Sequential UV aging enhanced the sorption of tetracycline onto polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene, with the magnitude of adsorption strongly dependent upon polymer type, degree of aging, and surrounding aqueous chemistry. Freshwater environments generally favoured stronger contaminant retention, whereas changing salinity and dissolved organic matter altered contaminant mobility in estuarine and marine waters.
Similarly, investigations examining the interaction between weathered microplastics and zinc oxide nanoparticles demonstrated that aging significantly alters contaminant retention mechanisms. Surface oxidation modifies electrostatic interactions, while changes in environmental chemistry, including pH, ionic strength, and dissolved organic matter further regulate contaminant uptake and release. These findings illustrate that contaminant transport by microplastics cannot be understood without simultaneously considering both particle weathering and surrounding water chemistry.
Weathering also Initiates another Important Transformation: Biofilm Formation
Within days of entering natural waters, microplastic surfaces become colonised by bacteria, algae, fungi, and other microorganisms that collectively form a biological coating known as the plastisphere. Biofilms modify nearly every physicochemical property of the particle. They alter density, hydrophobicity, surface charge, roughness, aggregation behaviour, and interactions with dissolved contaminants. At the same time, they can enhance the adsorption of metals, pharmaceuticals, and persistent organic pollutants while making particles more attractive to aquatic organisms by mimicking natural food sources.
These observations fundamentally change how we should think about environmental microplastics (Fig. 3).
Most laboratory toxicity studies still employ pristine commercial plastic particles. Yet, the overwhelming majority of particles encountered in rivers, lakes, estuaries, and oceans have already undergone months or years of environmental weathering. Understanding the behaviour of these environmentally transformed particles, not their pristine counterparts, is therefore essential for accurately predicting their transport, contaminant-carrying capacity, biological interactions, and ecological impacts.
As Prof. Gopala Krishna Darbha often emphasises, "The plastic entering our environment is not the same plastic that organisms ultimately encounter. Environmental transformation changes everything."
From Monitoring to Prediction
One of the greatest limitations of current microplastic research is that most studies describe where particles are found, but relatively few explain where they will go next. Environmental monitoring provides valuable snapshots of contamination, yet ecosystems are dynamic. Microplastics continuously aggregate, settle, resuspend, weather, and interact with changing water chemistry. Understanding these processes is essential for predicting ecological exposure and designing effective mitigation strategies.
To address this gap, our laboratory recently developed a hybrid framework that combines controlled laboratory experiments with machine learning to predict the environmental behaviour of nanoplastics across diverse aquatic systems. Rather than relying solely on observational datasets, we first performed systematic aggregation experiments under environmentally relevant conditions by varying pH, ionic strength, temperature, particle concentration, dissolved organic matter, weathering status, and cation composition. Aggregation behaviour was quantified using Critical Coagulation Concentration (CCC) measurements and aggregation kinetics, providing mechanistic information on the stability of nanoplastic suspensions under different geochemical conditions.
These experimentally generated datasets were then used to train a stacked machine-learning model capable of predicting nanoplastic behaviour under environmental conditions that would be extremely difficult to reproduce experimentally. Importantly, rather than treating machine learning as a "black box", we integrated Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to identify which environmental variables controlled model predictions. The XAI analysis demonstrated that pH generally enhanced colloidal stability, whereas elevated temperatures and particle concentrations promoted aggregation. Among dissolved ions, divalent cations such as calcium and magnesium exerted far greater influence on aggregation than monovalent ions, particularly after weathering modified particle surface chemistry.
Perhaps the most important outcome emerged when these experimentally validated models were extended to natural waters worldwide. Simulations predicted that groundwater, soil porewaters, and most freshwater rivers favour relatively stable nanoplastic suspensions, allowing prolonged transport over considerable distances. In contrast, the sharp increase in ionic strength within estuarine environments rapidly destabilises these particles, promoting aggregation and eventual sedimentation. These findings suggest that while rivers primarily function as transport pathways, estuaries act as natural sinks where microplastics and nanoplastics accumulate within bottom sediments. Such predictive approaches represent an important transition for the field—from documenting contamination to forecasting environmental fate and identifying hotspots where intervention strategies may be most effective.
Why Toxicity Cannot Be Predicted by Particle Counts Alone
One of the most common assumptions in environmental risk assessment is that higher concentrations of microplastics inevitably translate into greater biological toxicity. Although particle abundance undoubtedly influences exposure, our research consistently demonstrates that particle number alone is an insufficient predictor of ecological risk.
The biological response to microplastics depends not only on concentration, but also on particle size, polymer chemistry, surface charge, weathering history, contaminant loading, and the surrounding environmental matrix.
Microalgae, the primary producers supporting aquatic food webs, provide an excellent example. Our studies using Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Chlorella vulgaris demonstrate that nanoplastics can reduce photosynthetic efficiency, suppress chlorophyll synthesis, generate excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), disrupt antioxidant defence systems, and ultimately damage cellular membranes. However, these effects are rarely caused by plastics alone.
In natural environments, microplastics frequently coexist with other contaminants. When polystyrene nanoplastics were exposed together with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as chrysene and fluoranthene, combined exposure produced significantly greater physiological stress than individual contaminants. Elevated ROS production, reduced chlorophyll content, altered antioxidant enzyme activities, and increased membrane damage collectively demonstrated that interactions between coexisting pollutants can substantially modify toxicological outcomes.
A similar pattern emerged when we investigated tire wear particles interacting with zinc oxide nanoparticles. Tires themselves represent highly complex composite materials containing synthetic rubber, metals, antioxidants, and numerous chemical additives. Our experiments showed that zinc oxide nanoparticles strongly sorbed onto tire particles before interacting with freshwater microalgae. Combined exposure produced greater growth inhibition, oxidative stress, membrane damage, and physiological disruption than either contaminant alone. Toxicological modelling using Independent Action, Abbott, and Integrated Biomarker Response approaches consistently indicated synergistic toxicity, illustrating that environmental contaminants often become more hazardous through interaction rather than simple addition of individual effects.
Natural organic matter introduces another layer of complexity. Humic acids, abundant in most freshwater systems, were traditionally expected to reduce toxicity by coating particle surfaces and limiting biological interactions. Our results revealed a far more nuanced picture. At certain concentrations, humic acids reduced direct contact between nanoplastics and algal cells, lowering oxidative stress and mitigating toxicity. Under different environmental conditions, however, humic substances themselves contributed to physiological stress or altered particle stability in ways that modified biological responses.
These findings challenge a simplistic concentration-based view of microplastic toxicity. Environmental risk depends upon a dynamic network of interactions involving particle transformation, contaminant adsorption, water chemistry, and biological physiology. Two rivers containing identical numbers of microplastic particles may therefore present very different ecological risks depending on the environmental history and chemical composition of those particles.
Where Microplastic Science Must Go Next
The last decade has answered an essential question: Are microplastics present in our environment? The answer is undeniably yes.
The next decade must answer far more challenging questions:
How do particles move through interconnected ecosystems
How do they transform after months or years of environmental exposure?
Which particles are actually taken up by organisms? Which contaminants do they transport?
How do these interactions influence ecological and human health?
Answering these questions requires a shift in research priorities.
Future studies should move beyond one-time occurrence surveys towards long-term environmental monitoring capable of capturing seasonal variability and long-term trends. Monitoring should extend beyond surface waters to include the entire water column, sediments, groundwater, estuaries, and atmospheric pathways. Standardised methodologies, rigorous QA/QC protocols, and advanced analytical tools capable of identifying increasingly smaller particles will be essential for generating globally comparable datasets.
Perhaps most importantly, microplastic research must become increasingly interdisciplinary. Environmental chemistry, microbiology, toxicology, computational modelling, artificial intelligence, and human health research can no longer progress independently if we hope to understand the complete environmental journey of microplastics.
Our recent investigations into inhalable airborne microplastics illustrate this transition. By quantifying inhalable microplastics (<10 μm) across major Indian metropolitan cities, we demonstrated that urban populations may experience chronic respiratory exposure, with polyester fibres dominating the airborne polymer composition. However, the study extended well beyond particle counting. Using pyrolysis-GC-MS, microbial characterisation, and toxicological database analyses, we demonstrated that inhalable microplastics function as carriers for toxic metals, phthalates, persistent organic pollutants, pharmaceuticals, ultrafine particulate matter, and potentially pathogenic microorganisms. During periods of intense human activity, airborne microplastics harboured microbial communities containing antibiotic resistance and virulence genes, suggesting that these particles may simultaneously transport chemical contaminants and biologically active microorganisms. Such findings broaden the concept of the "Trojan horse" effect beyond aquatic systems and highlight the need to evaluate microplastics as multifunctional vectors capable of transporting complex mixtures of chemical and biological hazards.
The future of microplastic science therefore lies not in asking where plastics are found, but in understanding how they behave throughout their environmental life cycle, from emission and transport to transformation, biological interaction, and ultimately human exposure.
Prof. Darbha's Perspective:
Over the past decade, our laboratory has investigated microplastics across rivers, estuaries, coastal ecosystems, atmospheric environments, and biological systems. This scientific journey has gradually transformed our own perspective on plastic pollution.
Initially, we sought to answer where microplastics occur. We then realised that understanding their occurrence alone was insufficient. Their transport through rivers, accumulation within sediments, interaction with contaminants, environmental weathering, biological uptake, atmospheric transport, and ecological toxicity are all interconnected processes that determine their ultimate environmental significance.
In many ways, microplastic research is undergoing the same transformation experienced by other fields of environmental science. We are moving from descriptive observation towards predictive understanding.
As Prof. Gopala Krishna Darbha reflects:
"The first phase of microplastic research demonstrated that these particles are ubiquitous. That question has largely been answered. The challenge before us now is much greater. We must understand how microplastics evolve after entering the environment, how they interact with other contaminants, how they move across environmental compartments, and how they ultimately affect ecosystems and human health. The future of this field lies not in counting more particles, but in understanding the processes that govern their environmental journey. Only by integrating occurrence, transport, weathering, toxicity, atmospheric exposure, and predictive modelling can we move beyond documenting plastic pollution and begin developing scientifically informed strategies to mitigate one of the defining environmental challenges of our time".
By Prof. Gopala Krishna Darbha
Environmental Nanoscience Laboratory.
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata
References used:
Biswas, A., Saini, N., Chivukula, N., Samal, A., Jansari, M. R., Bhadury, P., & Darbha, G. K. (2025). The dawn of a new air pollutant: inhalable microplastics as emerging vectors of hazardous contaminants and their implications for human health. Environment International, 205, 109897. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109897
Choudhary, A., George, L., Mandal, A., Biswas, A., Ganie, Z. A., & Darbha, G. K. (2025). Assessment of microplastics and associated ecological risk in the longest river (Godavari) of peninsular India: A comprehensive source-to-sink analysis in water, sediment and fish. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 212, 117560.
Ganie, Z. A., Guchhait, S., Talib, M., Choudhary, A., & Darbha, G. K. (2025). Investigating the sorption of Zinc-Oxide nanoparticles on Tire-wear particles and their toxic effects on Chlorella vulgaris: Insights from toxicological models and physiological analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 483, 136648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136648
Ganie, Z. A., Mandal, A., Arya, L., T, S., Talib, M., & Darbha, G. K. (2024). Assessment and accumulation of microplastics in the Indian riverine systems: Risk assessment and implications of translocation across the water-to-fish continuum. Aquatic Toxicology, 272, 106944. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.106944
Karwadiya, J., Lützenkirchen, J., & Darbha, G. K. (2024). Retention of ZnO nanoparticles onto polypropylene and polystyrene microplastics: Aging-associated interactions and the role of aqueous chemistry. Environmental Pollution, 352, 124097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124097
Mandal, A., Singh, N., Mondal, A., Talib, M., Basu, R., Biswas, M. K., & Darbha, G. K. (2023). The extent of microplastic pollution along the eastern coast of India: Focussing on marine waters, beach sand, and fish. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 194, 115265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115265
Narayanan, G., Guo, X., Talib, M., Li, Y., Leung, J. Y., & Darbha, G. K. (2026). Humic acid can mitigate or magnify nanoplastic toxicity to freshwater microalgae: what are the factors driving these contrasting effects? Environmental Science: Nano, 13(3), 1372-1390.
Narayanan, G., Talib, M., Singh, N., & Darbha, G. K. (2024). Toxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (chrysene and fluoranthene) on the growth and physiological characteristics of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquatic Toxicology, 268, 106838. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.106838
Singh, N., Bhagat, J., Tiwari, E., Khandelwal, N., Darbha, G. K., & Shyama, S. K. (2021). Metal oxide nanoparticles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons alter nanoplastic’s stability and toxicity to zebrafish. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 407, 124382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124382
Talib, M., Choudhary, A., Ghosh, K., & Darbha, G. K. (2026). Hybrid ML-driven simulation exploring the fate of environmentally relevant nanoplastics in complex aqueous matrices: Mechanistic insight into colloidal behavior via explainable AI. Water Research, 301, 126016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.126016
Thykandi, S., Choudhary, A., Mandal, A., Ganie, Z. A., & Darbha, G. K. (2025). Impact of sequential UV-aging of microplastics on the fate of antibiotic (tetracycline) in riverine, estuarine, and marine systems. Environmental Research, 286, 122926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122926
Comments